Iran Threat Neutered as UAE Pipeline Starts Pumping

What’s the story? The 10bn AED Habshan-Fujairah pipeline opened this week, and is now transporting up to 2 million barrels of oil per day from Abu Dhabi to the country’s most eastern port.
I can’t believe you’re making me read a story about a pipeline! Yes, but it’s not really about the pipeline is it… It’s about the reasons for the pipeline, and the ramifications of it.
Ok, go on? In one step the UAE, and in fact the whole world, has reduced the risk of Iran closing the straight of Hormuz, something it has threatened to do continually, thus choking the world of a significant supply of oil, and the UAE its income. The Iranian threat has been, while not completely, significantly neutered.
And the ramifications? In the short term it’s likely to increase the already high levels of distrust between the UAE (and Gulf in general) and Iran. Relations are already messy: Take the Shiaa/Sunni divide, add disagreements over OPEC strategy, stir in Iran’s occupation of the Abu Musa islands, let it simmer before adding a pinch of polarising unrest in Bahrain and Yemen and you have the recipe for a further souring of relations between the countries.
So why do it? As we said, a guarantee of income, and to neuter the Iranian threat. The cost of moving – and more importantly insuring – the transportation of oil will also be reduced. From a particularly UAE perspective, the pipeline speeds up economic progress outside of Abu Dhabi-Dubai-Sharjah. Spreading the wealth to poorer emirates has been very much policy since the onset of the Arab Spring.
Any response from Tehran? Silence so far. Iran may well be kicking itself for getting itself into this position: Its threat of choking the Straight of Hormuz has backfired.
To quote Saadallah Al Fathi, former head of the Energy Studies Department in Opec Secretariat in Vienna, speaking to Gulf News:
“It will show Iran that the countries of the region will not take its threats lightly and that they have the means to reduce the damage if ever it occurs. It is also an invitation to Iran to follow a cooperative policy rather than force other countries into expensive means to deny Iran the possibility of threatening their exports.”
Related posts:
- “Three Months at Most”: How Long Could Iran Close Straits of Hormuz? ROB L. WAGNER: As tensions increase all parties are beginning to make calculations regarding the effect of a possible conflict in the Arabian Gulf. ...
- Iran: Problems on the Horizon for Gulf States DAVID ROBERTS: These events take place in the context of growing Shia power, encapsulated by the notion of a Shia crescent ‘enveloping’ the region......
- Iran’s Next Move after Bahrain “Invasion” DAVID ROBERTS: Without wishing to state the obvious, the longer Saudi troops are in Bahrain - the "Invaders" according to Press TV, the greater the risk of Iran’s meddling....
- Tension Between the United States and Iran Escalates: Is Conflict Now Inevitable? DAVID ROBERTS: It appears that both the United States and Iran's domestic political requirements have spun the region into a dangerous spiral....
- U.S. Warns Iran Closing the Strait of Hormuz Means War RICHARD SILVERSTEIN: Right now I’m thinking of that Marx Brothers line: To war! To war! Fredonia’s going to war! Except this will be far from a farce....
- How the GCC Should Go About ‘Containing’ Iran MISHAAL AL GERGAWI: Bahrain was clearly a red line for the GCC, but the challenges now facing the organisation require deft political skill. ...
by Editor, MEP
Editor of MidEastPosts.com, on the hunt for great writers and stories about the Middle East.



True, but the article was specifically referring to the United Arab Emirates. As a country its risks have been significantly mitigated by an alternative way to transport its oil.
I read that 17 million barrels of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz every day but your key states that the new pipeline carries only 1.5 million barrels per day, which is less than 10% of the total.